Skip to Main Content

June 2007, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 25



Summary
The content focuses on solving a paradox question related to the discrepancy in innovation levels between 19th-century French painting and sculpture, despite both being funded by the French Academy of Art.
  • Paradox questions require explaining a discrepancy or a situation that doesn't seem to make sense.
  • The French Academy of Art sponsored both painting and sculpture, but discouraged innovation, leading to less innovation in sculpture compared to painting.
  • The paradox is that despite similar funding sources and discouragement of innovation, painting saw more innovation than sculpture.
  • Answer choice C explains the paradox by highlighting that painters could still innovate due to lower costs of paint and canvas, unlike sculptors who were more financially dependent on the Academy.
  • Other answer choices either exacerbate the paradox or fail to address the discrepancy adequately.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Paradox Questions
00:06
Identifying the Discrepancy
00:35
Analyzing the Paradox
02:15
Resolving the Paradox