June 2007, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 21
Next Lesson
PrepTest 123 (June 2007), LR1
Summary
The content focuses on how to approach and solve a flaw question on the LSAT, specifically by identifying the error in an argument through understanding its conclusion and evidence.
- Flaw questions require identifying the argument's conclusion and evidence.
- A common flaw is confusing correlation with causation, illustrated by an argument involving trading a sports car for a minivan to reduce accident risk.
- The correct answer choice points out the flaw of inferring a cause from a mere correlation.
- Other answer choices are dismissed by analyzing the argument's structure and the evidence provided.
- The process emphasizes critical thinking and careful analysis of the argument's assumptions and logical structure.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Flaw Questions
00:52
Confusing Correlation with Causation
01:53
Analyzing Answer Choices