June 2007, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 6
Next Lesson
PrepTest 123 (June 2007), LR1
Summary
The content focuses on dissecting a sufficient assumption question on the LSAT, illustrating how to bridge the gap between the conclusion and evidence to find the correct answer.
- Identify the conclusion and evidence within the question, noting the gap that exists between them.
- The correct answer to a sufficient assumption question will make the conclusion absolutely true by bridging the identified gap.
- Analysis of a sample question involving Murray's eligibility for the Executive Administrator position based on his qualifications and a felony conviction.
- Evaluation of answer choices, demonstrating the process of elimination based on the question's requirements and the evidence provided.
- Selection of the correct answer that conclusively proves Murray's ineligibility for the position, illustrating the application of LSAT strategies.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Sufficient Assumption Questions
00:32
Identifying Conclusion and Evidence