June 2007, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 20
Next Lesson
PrepTest 123 (June 2007), LR1
Summary
The content focuses on dissecting a strategy of argumentation question, specifically illustrating how to analyze and critique an argument by breaking it down into its conclusion and evidence, using a sample LSAT question.
- Understanding the argument requires identifying the conclusion and the evidence presented.
- The example provided contrasts the arguments of Gamba and Munoz regarding a new water system, highlighting the importance of scrutinizing the basis of claims.
- Gamba's critique centers on the inadequacy of the voting sample size to represent the city's population's view, challenging Munoz's conclusion.
- The correct answer choice (E) is identified by matching Gamba's strategy of casting doubt on the conclusion due to an unreliable statistical sample.
- This process exemplifies the method of reasoning questions on the LSAT, emphasizing critical thinking and analytical skills.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Method of Reasoning Questions
00:17
Breaking Down the Argument
01:15
Analyzing Answer Choices
02:11
Identifying the Correct Answer