June 2007, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 4
Next Lesson
PrepTest 123 (June 2007), LR1
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of a flaw question on the LSAT, focusing on identifying the error in an argument related to Ocksenfrey's prepackaged meals' nutritional value.
- A flaw question requires breaking down the argument into conclusion and evidence.
- The conclusion is that Ocksenfrey's prepackaged meals are nutritious, challenged by a biased report from Connorly.
- The flaw identified is treating the rejection of evidence as proof of the opposite conclusion.
- The correct answer choice (A) treats evidence of bias as evidence that the Connorly Report's claims are false.
- Other answer choices are dismissed for various reasons, highlighting the importance of closely analyzing the argument's structure and evidence.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Flaw Questions
01:14
Analyzing the Flaw and Answer Choices