PrepTest 73, Logical Reasoning 2, Question 26
Summary
The content focuses on how to approach necessary assumption questions in the GRE, using a specific argument about genetically engineered crops and wildlife recovery as an example.
- Necessary assumption questions require identifying an assumption critical to the argument's validity.
- Understanding the argument involves distinguishing between its conclusion and its evidence.
- The example argument concludes that using genetically engineered crops is likely to benefit wildlife populations, based on the premise that these crops do not require harmful insecticides.
- Identifying the assumption involves recognizing that the argument assumes no unstated harms or benefits that could negate the conclusion.
- The correct answer choice confirms that genetically engineered crops cause less harm than crops sprayed with insecticides, aligning with the argument's assumption.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Necessary Assumptions
00:20
Analyzing the Argument
01:38
Identifying the Correct Assumption
02:09
Evaluating Answer Choices
This is the last lesson of the section
