PrepTest 73, Logical Reasoning 2, Question 10
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of how to approach and solve a flaw question on the GRE, using a vacuum cleaner sales pitch as an example to illustrate the critical thinking required to identify logical fallacies in arguments.
- Flaw questions require identifying why an argument is vulnerable based on its structure and presented evidence.
- The example used involves comparing two vacuum cleaners to demonstrate a common logical fallacy: comparing outcomes under different conditions.
- The correct approach involves breaking down the argument into its component parts: the conclusion, the evidence, and identifying the flaw in comparison.
- The analysis of answer choices highlights the importance of closely aligning the critique with the specific flaw in the argument's logic.
- The correct answer choice points out the flaw by noting the unequal comparison conditions, emphasizing the need for an 'apples to apples' comparison.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Flaw Questions
00:17
Analyzing the Argument
00:52
Identifying the Logical Fallacy
01:25
Evaluating Answer Choices
