June 2007, Logical Reasoning 2, Question 8
Summary
The content focuses on dissecting and critiquing an argument within a GRE question, specifically targeting the logical flaws in an advertisement's claim about a fabric softener's effectiveness.
- Identifying the argument's conclusion and evidence is crucial for understanding and critiquing its logic.
- The argument's main flaw lies in comparing the product's effectiveness to having no product at all, rather than to other products on the market.
- A proper critique of the argument involves recognizing the disconnect between being better than nothing and being the best available option.
- The correct answer choice highlights the argument's failure to consider comparisons with other fabric softeners, pinpointing the logical gap.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Argument Critique
00:22
Identifying the Argument's Flaw
00:53
Evaluating the Evidence
01:34
Selecting the Correct Answer
