Skip to Main Content

June 2007, Logical Reasoning 2, Question 7


Carl Pyrdum
Lesson by Carl Pyrdum
Magoosh Expert

Summary
The essence of tackling pointed issue questions on the LSAT involves identifying a specific disagreement between two perspectives, as illustrated through an analysis of a question about moderation and risk-taking.
  • Pointed issue questions require proving a disagreement between two parties based on their stated positions.
  • Antonio defines moderation as never deviating from the middle course but highlights the loss of spontaneity and opportunities.
  • Marla argues that true moderation involves moderating moderation itself, implying that taking risks is part of living a moderate life.
  • The correct answer (B) is identified by understanding that Antonio and Marla disagree on what a life of moderation entails regarding risk-taking.
  • Other answer choices are dismissed by closely analyzing the specific views and implications of Antonio and Marla's statements.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding Pointed Issue Questions
00:21
Analyzing Perspectives on Moderation
01:49
Identifying the Core Disagreement
02:10
Evaluating Incorrect Answer Choices