PrepTest 73, Logical Reasoning 1, Question 14
Next Lesson
PrepTest 141 (PrepTest 73), LR1
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of a method of reasoning question from the LSAT, focusing on the argumentative exchange between Inez and Winona regarding the justification for funding space exploration.
- Inez argues for the necessity of investing in space exploration, citing its ability to pay for itself through technological advancements.
- Winona counters by arguing that if technological advancements are the goal, they should be funded directly rather than through space exploration programs.
- The analysis breaks down each argument, highlighting the importance of understanding both sides to accurately describe Winona's response.
- The correct answer choice (E) is identified by accurately capturing Winona's stance that the desired outcomes can be achieved without Inez's proposed method.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding the Argument Structure
00:28
Analyzing Inez's Argument
01:07
Dissecting Winona's Counterargument
01:48
Evaluating the Answer Choices