Skip to Main Content

PrepTest 73, Passage 2, Question 11

Carl Pyrdum
Lesson by Carl Pyrdum
Magoosh Expert
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of an LSAT analogy question, focusing on identifying the analogous relationship between a given scenario and the answer choices.
  • The question revolves around understanding the relationship between Cameron and her artworks, emphasizing the unintended effects of her creations.
  • The analysis involves comparing this relationship to various scenarios across different disciplines to find a match that mirrors the original relationship's dynamics.
  • Answer choice C, a sculptor using ordinary objects to create works with a certain grandeur, is identified as the correct analogy, reflecting the unintended yet positive outcome of Cameron's work.
  • Other answer choices are systematically eliminated based on their failure to accurately mirror the relationship between Cameron's intentions and the outcomes of her art.
  • The explanation highlights the importance of closely examining the specifics of the original scenario and the answer choices to accurately solve analogy questions on the LSAT.
Chapters
00:00
Understanding the Original Relationship
00:52
Analyzing the Answer Choices
01:38
Identifying the Correct Analogy
02:03
Eliminating Incorrect Options