PrepTest 78, Game 3, Question 16
Next Lesson
Summary
The analysis of a specific LSAT logic game question demonstrates the process of elimination and rule application to determine which answer choices could be true.
- Answer choice A is eliminated because it contradicts the rule that M must come before S, and S cannot be first.
- Answer choice B is not possible because placing L second triggers a conditional rule that cannot be satisfied with the given order.
- Answer choice C is dismissed for similar reasons as A, where placing V second contradicts the rule regarding S's placement.
- Answer choice D is explored in both possible scenarios ('OR options'), but neither allows L to be third without breaking the established rules.
- Through elimination, answer choice E is determined to be correct, with a review confirming M can indeed be fifth in one of the scenarios.
Chapters
00:00
Eliminating Incorrect Answers
00:30
Analyzing Answer Choice B
01:22
Dissecting Answer Choice D
02:30
Confirming Answer Choice E