PrepTest 79, Game 3, Question 16
PrepTest 79, Game 3, Question 16
1 minutes
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
This video could not be loaded. If video issues continue after switching web browsers, check out our Video FAQs for more advice.
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of a specific LSAT logical reasoning question, focusing on the assignment of individuals to courses and the logical implications of these assignments.
- The question revolves around the scenario where Vogel (V) and Zane (Z) are assigned to the same course, exploring the constraints this setup imposes.
- The correct answer is identified as option C, where T is assigned to markets, which necessitates that S must also be assigned to markets.
- The analysis reveals that V and Z being together excludes Y from being in the same situation due to the restrictions on course assignments.
- It concludes that Y must be in pricing, which contradicts the scenario where Z is supposed to be in pricing, highlighting a logical inconsistency.
Chapters
00:00
Introduction to the Logical Reasoning Question
00:47
Concluding the Logical Inconsistency