Skip to Main Content

PrepTest 79, Game 3, Question 16

Rese Ruffin
Lesson by Rese Ruffin
Magoosh Expert
Summary
The content provides an in-depth analysis of a specific LSAT logical reasoning question, focusing on the assignment of individuals to courses and the logical implications of these assignments.
  • The question revolves around the scenario where Vogel (V) and Zane (Z) are assigned to the same course, exploring the constraints this setup imposes.
  • The correct answer is identified as option C, where T is assigned to markets, which necessitates that S must also be assigned to markets.
  • The analysis reveals that V and Z being together excludes Y from being in the same situation due to the restrictions on course assignments.
  • It concludes that Y must be in pricing, which contradicts the scenario where Z is supposed to be in pricing, highlighting a logical inconsistency.
Chapters
00:00
Introduction to the Logical Reasoning Question
00:47
Concluding the Logical Inconsistency